PH
Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 2025 was Palomar’s strongest quarter to date: adjusted EPS of $1.87 and total revenues of $174.6M, both above Street, with an adjusted combined ratio of 68.5% and adjusted ROE of 27.0% .
- Results beat consensus on adjusted EPS ($1.87 vs $1.60*) and total revenues ($174.6M vs $161.8M*), supported by a higher net earned premium ratio (43.7%), favorable cat development, and strong growth in casualty and Hawaii hurricane .
- FY25 adjusted net income guidance was raised twice: to $186–$200M with Q1 results, then to $195–$205M after the June 1 reinsurance placement delivered ~10% risk‑adjusted rate decreases and incremental earthquake limit (now $3.53B) .
- Near‑term catalysts: reinsurance savings and expanded limits, continued casualty momentum, and Q3 seasonal crop dynamics (combined ratio mid‑to‑upper 70s) that investors should model explicitly .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Record adjusted net income ($51.3M) and adjusted EPS ($1.87), with adjusted combined ratio improving to 68.5% from 73.0% YoY; management emphasized “continued execution of Palomar 2X” and a 27% adjusted ROE .
- Product growth breadth: Earthquake +23.2% YoY GWP, Casualty +112.7%, Inland Marine & Other Property +29.1%; Hawaii hurricane grew 82% with +26% rate on renewals .
- Reinsurance achievements: upsized $525M Torrey Pines Re cat bond at the low end of indicated range and executed standalone Laulima XOL; later completed June 1 placement at ~10% risk‑adjusted rate decrease and increased FY guidance .
What Went Wrong
- Fronting continues to be a headwind: GWP down 43.1% YoY; runoff headwinds quantified at ~$48M in Q1, ~$44M in Q2, and ~$30M in Q3 .
- Competitive pressure in large commercial property (Commercial All Risk) and rate softening in commercial quake layered/shared; Palomar has “all but exited” CAR to protect returns, keeping only a small toe‑hold .
- Expense ratios trending higher as the company invests ahead of crop seasonality and organizational scale: other underwriting expense ratio expected to be ~8% for FY25, highest in Q2 due to Advanced AgProtection integration timing .
Financial Results
Sequential and Trend Comparison
YoY Comparison (Q1 2025 vs Q1 2024)
Actual vs Consensus (Q1 2025)
Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Segment Breakdown (GWP by Product)
KPIs
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “Record adjusted net income... 69% adjusted combined ratio, and a 27% adjusted ROE... continued execution of the Palomar 2X strategic imperative... same‑store premium growth rate was 37%.” — Mac Armstrong (CEO) .
- “We are pleased to secure $525 million of earthquake limit through our sixth and largest Torrey Pines Re... pricing ~15% down risk‑adjusted... Laulima treaty priced favorable... positioned to achieve, if not exceed, flat to down 5% assumption.” — Mac Armstrong .
- “We expect Q3 to be the low point of net earned premium ratio... highest loss dollars and loss ratio... combined ratio mid‑to‑upper 70s, primarily due to crop.” — T. Christopher Uchida (CFO) .
- “We have all but exited Commercial All Risk... better to allocate property/cat capital to quake or builders risk.” — Mac Armstrong .
Q&A Highlights
- Reinsurance pricing and guidance: Achieved better-than-assumed placements (cat bond ~-15%, Laulima favorable), with conservatism retained until full $2B+ EQ limit placed; plan to update after June 1 .
- Strategic rationale for standalone Laulima treaty: build a fee‑based, stand‑alone entity; peril diversification for reinsurers increases deployable limit .
- Earthquake mix and growth: Residential strong with record new business; small commercial more insulated; large commercial layered/shared facing increased competition and rate pressure .
- Casualty growth drivers: talent hires, distribution breadth, market dislocation in E&S casualty; disciplined attachment points and net lines (~$0.913M average) .
- Fronting runoff quantification: ~$48M Q1 headwind, ~$44M Q2, ~$30M Q3; peak impact in Q1–Q3 .
- Crop seasonality and loss ratio: majority earned in Q3 (~65–75%); crop loss ratios higher (~80%); Q3 ratios will reflect blended actuals and expectations .
Estimates Context
- Q1 2025 adjusted EPS: $1.87 actual vs $1.60* consensus; total revenues: $174.6M actual vs $161.8M* consensus; beats driven by stronger net earned premium ratio and favorable loss ratio (cat development and reserve conservatism) .
- FY 2025 consensus EPS: ~7.73* prior to June 1 placement; company raised FY25 adjusted net income guidance to $195–$205M post‑renewal, implying upside risk to estimates if casualty/crop momentum and reinsurance savings persist .
Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Palomar delivered a clean beat on adjusted EPS and revenue, with operating metrics trending better sequentially and YoY; the beat is quality (underwriting and investment income) .
- Reinsurance renewal outcomes are a material positive: ~10% risk‑adjusted rate decreases, lower hurricane retention ($11M), and expanded earthquake limit to $3.53B; guidance raised accordingly .
- Fronting runoff is a known, quantified headwind through Q3; underlying non‑fronting lines (Earthquake, Casualty, Hawaii hurricane) are driving profitable growth .
- Model Q3 seasonality carefully: expect apex in combined ratio (mid‑to‑upper 70s) due to crop; ratios normalize in Q4 .
- Expense ratios will be modestly higher in Q2 from crop integration and broader investments; long‑term scale should improve efficiency within Palomar 2X framework .
- Product mix shift toward residential property and casualty under disciplined net lines supports earnings consistency amid commercial property competition .
- Near‑term trading catalyst: June 1 reinsurance savings and guidance raise; medium‑term thesis: diversified specialty portfolio, disciplined risk appetite, and capital allocation driving ROE >20% and consistent beats (10th straight) .